William, John:

To say that Mr. Perle is a 'neo-conservative' is not really giving Mr.
Perle's political beliefs much depth.

Why would Perle confront the UN?
With a title like "Thank God for the Death of the UN" one can quite
quickly
discern that he is not in favor of its existence.

For an unbalanced education on Mr. Perle's position, see this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/
This is the website of the Project for the New American Century, whose
doctrine in a nutshell (according to them) is this:
 that American leadership is good both for America and for the world; that
such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and
commitment
to moral principle; and that too few political leaders today are making
the
case for global leadership.

Here is an editorial on PNAC:
http://truthout.org/docs_03/022803A.shtml
http://truthout.org/docs_02/022203A.htm

Best of all, by Maureen Dowd:
Perle's Plunder Blunder
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/23/opinion/23DOWD.html?ex=1049000400&en=b0a55
b4f79e35c68&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

(url WILL wrap)


Thanks, 

John Ellingsworth
http://ellingsworth.org/john/

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to