I suspect if you break one long message into 2 shorter ones; the two shorter ones are more likely to be read.
Of course if you can say interesting stuff with fewer words, there will always be an audience for that.
Better to be misunderstood than boring.
WRZ
----Original Message Follows---- From: "Charles H. Buchholtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William Zardus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ... Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:58:52 -0500
From: "William Zardus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:13:17 +0000
Generally speaking, I'd say it's better to post short messages to a list like this.
Well, better or not, you're under no obligation to read it.
"I have made this [letter] longer than usual, only because I have not had the time to make it shorter. -- Blaise Pascal
--- Chip
_________________________________________________________________
Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech Hacks & Scams. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/techsafety.armx
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
