Brian Siano wrote:
Glenn wrote:
It showed how FOCP can ban anyone whom the leaders perceive as a
threat to their power or ask questions like "evil Ray." Consider
this, if the leaders of FOCP rely on nothing more than the ad hominem
machine on a PUBLIC listserv, why would they be trusted to be fair
when allowing people to speak or participate in CLOSED "community
discussions"? We have to stop pretending.
Further evidence of the FOCP's prevention of community participation:
http://www.clarkpark.info/ParkA.htm
Come and see more at our General Membership Meeting on Wednesday, July
18th:
so here we have glenn and focp talking past one another
again. "you're bad!" "no, we're good, YOU'RE bad!" "now see
that's what makes YOU bad, calling me bad!" "yeah? well too
bad you're bad, it's a good thing we're good!" "well good
for you but you're still bad!" etc etc etc
let's summarize:
once upon a time, focp was good, glenn was good, park users
were good. then ucd stepped in. and then suddenly the park
was bad, park users were bad, glenn was bad and the so were
the new focp folks pushing folks like glenn out. and now
that glenn is out, the bad folks running focp look good,
involving the good park users in ucd's good agenda for the
good park, but glenn still looks bad. the end.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
it's not that glenn is bad, it's that he looks bad.
it's not that focp is good, it's that they look good.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
