Dave is entirely right. Let's take this point one step further --
What should be "morally part of the public record" is usually a job for internal agency regulators, not external agency regulators.
People who are chiefly agitated over these moral issues (really a kind of policy concern) should be getting with the agency in question, because only the agency in question can change its policies.
People who want agencies to change their "moral PR" record, without themselves ever having supported any moral activity undertaken by that agency, are classified as "wankers" according to ancient precepts of Anglo-Norman jurisprudence. They play no role in public policy, ever.
-- Tony West Dave wrote:
2) Talking about what is and isn't legally required to be a part of the public record is relevant. Talking about what is "morally" part of the public record is a matter of personal opinion, and is really only relevant if one is making a stand for changes in the legal requirements.
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
