I'd say it's relevant because: 1) committeeman7 aparantly had insider knowledge about what was going to happen at the meeting. What they posted was, it seems, exactly what happened at the meeting. 2) when Glenn was falsely accused about being the poster and there was SIGNIFICANT fallout, committeeman7 did not come forward and say "Woah dudes, lay off, I'm not Glenn. I made a factual post."
So the question "why did committeeman7 make the post and then leave Glenn to fend for himself amongst the jackles?" I think is relevant. And now we discover that it was probably someone who was at the meeting or who works for someone who was at the meeting.... Maybe it was UCD! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:05:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Who Committeeman7 is, has not. What's the relevance? The posting on our little list had nothing to do with what happened at the meeting. Al ________________________________ See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503> . ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
