> In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:05:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Who Committeeman7 is, has not [been clarified]. > > In a message dated 6/7/07 12:06:01 PM, Krfapt writes: > What's the relevance? The posting on our little list had nothing to do > with what happened at the meeting. > Al > > Really? Our "little list" of over 300 University City folks who care enough about what's happening in this community to stay aboard, despite having to endure frequently nasty exchanges and messages? We don't count? We can be lied to, or spoken to anonymously by folks who refuse to reveal their identities?
According to Tony's report, the first Thursday meeting <<... asked that UCD policies in general be made public.>> What about the Councilwoman's office's policies? Shouldn't they be public also? We elect her; should her office and/or her supporters be sending anonymous emails to the listserv? Or was it sent by an anonymous supporter of John Fenton? Or somebody who just guessed about today's meeting, and just happened to be right? In any case, what is to be gained by adding new layers of secrecy to neighborhood processes? Committeeman7 knew what was going to happen today and is probably reading my questions on the list now. Who is he, or she, and why is this person afraid to identify him or herself? Al, you didn't answer my question: do you know? Melani Lamond Melani Lamond, Associate Broker Urban & Bye, Realtor 3529 Lancaster Ave. Philadelphia, PA 19104 cell phone 215-356-7266 office phone 215-222-4800, ext. 113 office fax 215-222-1101 ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
