Out of all the responses, I think it most interesting that this "imposter" of Glenn could still be listening to everything that we type about him/her, and could still be responding under a different assumed name.
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with anything said before or now. No opinion of the subject whatsoever, just finding it slightly amusing. Dan Myers On 6/6/07, Brian Siano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glenn wrote: > Let me explain the arrogance of the poster. The poster was trying to > frame me. I have been very clear that I blame UCD policy and secrecy > for recent media reports and not Councilwoman Blackwell or John > Fenton. The hubris of the poster shows as he tries to destroy my > credibility, of course, but also make it look like I was trying to > embarass the councilwoman too. I have no idea who this committeeperson poster is-- tho I suspect that I'm a suspect. But the _reason_ that Glenn's name turned up in that message's header is extremely simple. Committeeman did what many of us probably do-- to post to the list, we reply to an existing note. Sometimes we change the subject line. But, as has been pointed out before, the message header _still contains_ the note it replies to-- thus, the presence of the text string "glenn" in the header. In other words; just as this was not evidence that Glenn was spamming the list, it is also not evidence that someone was trying to "frame" him. (It would be a pretty unreliable way of framing anyone, anyway.) ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
-- to the power of breathing, Dan Myers Intuitive Masseur 215.901.0899
