Hi Glenn -
Yeah, those people at the meeting probably remember Andersen popping off at
the HMS Director about toxic water ... why again did he do that? I found this
in my old email, I think it speaks for itself:
>From: B Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
>Subject: Re: [UC] thanks to the list
>Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:44:17 -0500
>
>Glenn -
>
>It's pretty chicken sh*t to jump in on a process that has been going on for
>two years and start making all sorts of wild-eyed accusations. It's also
>chicken sh*t to run around at a meeting, spreading all sorts of
>misinformation about an issue -browbeating someone who is marginal on the
>issue.
>
>It is especially chicken sh*t to then loudly announce at the beginning of
>the meeting that you won't be voting because you don't like the leadership
>of FoCP - when in truth you just don't want to part with $20.
>
>If I sound miffed it's because I also think its chicken sh*t to turn your
>back on someone who's waiting to talk to you so you can browbeat someone
>else into signing your petition.
>
>bga
>
>On 1/18/06, Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Thanks for your patience and interest in the recent discussion about
>FOCP
> > activities. Of course, we all wish that neighborhood problems like this
> > didn't require this type of public disclosure. If FOCP had good
> > leadership and was accountable to its membership, park issues could be
> > handled in an appropriate and neighborly way. We could have even had a
> > responsible discussion about dogs.
> >
> > I know a lot of folks trivialize the issues of process as we see
>democracy
> > being replaced with consumerocracy.
> > But when you are out there trying to earn the $20 bucks to give FOCP,
> > you'll be happy of the process for a fair trial if you're arrested
>because a
> > police officer thought you were Glenn Moyer, leader of the killer
>wolves.
> >
> > Thanks again for your interest,
> >
> > Glenn
> >
Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Biggy Anderson,
Are you still fantasizing about throwing bricks at dogs? Do you ever act on
these violent fantasies? Just curious.
That was funny when the crowd told you to shut up when you started insulting
the Director of the HMS School at that FOCP meeting. Remember, that was just
before you started calling me a chicken sh*t on the list.
What is your position at the SHCA? I've long maintained that the biggest
jerks flock to leadership positions in these civic associations like flies to
shit. Say hi to your gang for me.
Do you mind if I start using you as an example in my writings about civic
gangs?
Mr. Chickensh*t
----- Original Message -----
From: B Andersen
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [UC] Trash ticket update
Kyle -
Maybe he's calling you BID Boy because he's trying to silence you through
derision. If I say, Kyle, that your tin foil hat is quite pretty, Kyle, would
you please stop being so silly?
Just curious.
bga
On 7/6/07, Kyle Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Y'all will probably
remember that I've gotten four of these tickets and since the
Moyer-UCD-Conspiracy-Theory labels me as a "BID Boy" I highly doubt this is
part of a UCD plot. But he's right that something is seriously wrong here. I'd
been complaining about this seemingly random ticketing for ages and it was
finally Matt Wolfe who, through Frank Rizzo's office got it settled for me.
(UCD, in the form of John Fenton, offered to appear as a character witness for
me, but apart from that UCD was unable to solve the ticketing problem.) One
part of the solution was that I take a digital picture of the front of my house
every day and more on days when my neighbors put their trash out at random
times since my getting tickets often seems to be related to next door neighbors
putting out trash on random days (or letting their weeds grow to five feet
tall). The last three times that a ticket has shown up, I've been able
to flip through the photo archive and show what the front of my house looked
like on that day. I think everybody agrees that this is an outrageous solution
and an onerous burden on the homeowner -- to daily have to prove their
innocence. Tickets should be delivered on the day they're written, if not the
day after, and if I can take a digital photo of my non-violation, why can't the
ticketing officer take an illustrative photo of the actual offense? It seems to
me that would be a foolproof solution as the person receiving the ticket would
have the option to say, at their hearing "That's not my house, I actually live
over here, this is my neighbor at #412 in the photo" or "Dang, ya got me."
I agree with Glenn about one thing, the ticketing system, as it stands, seems
to be largely random. I have neighbors who dump trash on the street four days
before trash-day with seeming impunity, two neighbors who let their lawns grow
high enough to hide tigers, with seeming impunity, and then we hear on the list
of random good neighbors who are recycle nazi's and chronic front-walk sweepers
who suddenly get a ticket saying they had mountains of trash in front of their
house four months prior. This anecdotal evidence makes me wonder if the ticket
writers could be doing a lot of their work from the Green Line. I want stricter
trash-code enforcement, because I don't want garbage blowing up and down the
street, and I don't want to be tripping over cardboard boxes filled with lemon
rinds and plaster but I want it to be based on actual violations.
kc
>Friends, together the evidence points overwhelmingly to many of our tickets
>being
>manufactured in a coordinated effort with the UCD. Our property addresses are
>chosen
>by an unaccountable UCD to serve their intimidation purposes. If you saw the
>front of
>my house, you would see that I am being targeted by UCD for this harassment
>and intimidation
>for reasons other than trash.
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake.
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
