Hey Andrew,

Yesterday in the Inky was an interesting article about
the police commissioner, Sylvester Johnson.  He
believes the stop and frisk policy would be a
disaster.  His focus is how this will turn the clock
back on police/community relations and destroy,
perhaps in months, the gains which have taken years to
forge.  He cites the recent request for community
volunteers and getting 10,000 people to show up as
evidence of improving relations.

I have not seen details of this $10,000 tax credit
first alluded to in the primaries.  In my experience,
this tax credit strategy sounds much better than it
turns out to be.  

Over a decade ago, I looked for employers for
individuals with chronic substance abuse disease.  I
think all those I worked with counted as ex-offenders
too.

The employers weren't interested in the federal tax
breaks available.  As a large industrial janitorial
contractor explained to me, when the details come out:
there is so much work and little hope for actually
qualifying.  

This same employer was very interested in the program
I was offering to help bridge the gap to employment.
For 6 months, I maintained case management services
for the referrals with an up-front agreement for
three-way open communication to assist the individuals
maintain their jobs.  My referrals succeeded very well
but in almost all cases minor problems arose that
could have easily caused termination in those first
six months.  

Now does this reward only kick-in after the first six
months of employment?  That would suggest to me lots
of hoops for legitimate employers, lots of fraud, and
very little impact on maintaining employment or
reducing recidivism.

 The intervention I worked on was a small pilot
project but was successful because it was a good
design based on previous empirical evidence not sound
bites.  Unfortunately, there is no political will
among the people to expand good policy when sound
bites are available to our political leaders.

I believe these tax break strategies are akin to
"creaming."  The individuals most at risk for criminal
recidivism will be those most at risk to lose their
jobs in the first six months.  These strategies look
like some incredible attempt to solve the problem
around elections yet do almost nothing for the problem
while distracting society from looking at the
underlining problems and implementing sound policy.

Then, the reports come about the brilliant plan
failing because the individuals are beyond all hope.
I've seen this pattern repeat so many times that now
the fear in society has become so extreme that we are
considering policies to end civil liberties and the
bill of rights for the majority of people/criminals in
our midst.

I'm sorry I feel compelled to disagree so strongly
with something that sounds so positive.  

I would very much like to see the full plan.  If the
details for the employers are not available, I will
continue to dismiss it as political rhetoric and poor
policy.  I saw this tax credit suggested in the
primary without any details which I could find.

Andrew you seem good at this. If you can get the
details, please share.  I'd love to change my mind or
get folks to talk to the next mayor about the problems
I outlined.

Thanks,
Glenn









 


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> I don't know if anyone else made it to Michael
> Nutter's community forum the
> other night, but he mentioned a bill that I believe
> will be before city council
> this week.  Somehow it had escaped my notice thus
> far.  It calls for a $10,000
> credit against the business privilege tax for
> companies that hire ex-offenders
> for 6-months or more.  He also cited a staggering
> 72% recidivism rate in the
> city.  The proposal was extremely popular with the
> crowd, and he couldn't
> resist adding a couple of pull-up-your-pants
> applause lines at the end.  I
> posted a video clip here:
> 
> http://malcolmxpark.org/?p=494
> 
> Andrew
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
> the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive
> information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to