Well, I think Philadelphia has some beautiful architectural elements.
Apparently the AIA members think so as well as they commented when they
convened here a couple of years ago.

As for the expanding economy, we'll have to wait a bit on that.  I'm already
down some 21,000 in my portfolio and the current quarter does not bode well.

Also, that "Radon" Building on Walnut St. is a monstrosity!


On 10/24/08 10:58 PM, "Anthony West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I had chosen to settle in University City solely for the brilliance
> of the architecture that Penn might someday build for my amusement ...
> I'd have moved out of town a long, long time ago. Maybe to Barcelona, or
> Sydney, or back to sweet home Chicago, where ordinary folks truly
> respect a nice new public building.
> 
> Such enthusiasm is wasted in Philadelphia, whose classic architectural
> tradition is based on predictable, pompous mediocrity from previous
> epochs-- the sort of boring stuff our "historic districts" are based on.
> Not that I'm against them; in fact, I settled here precisely because I
> preferred this mediocre old-timey style to Chicago's jumpy ambitions.
> Philadelphia Dull is pleasing to the eye and it works as a lifestyle
> too. Sacred, however, it is not.
> 
> Back to Penn. It owns some buildings erected in the 19th c. that are
> beautiful and important. It owns many buildings erected in the 20th c.
> that are garishly functional. Such is life in a rapidly-expanding
> 21st-c. university district. The latest architecture of Houston and Baku
> and Bangalore probably isn't much prettier. But having an expanding
> economy beats having a contracting economy.
> 
> -- Tony West
> 
>> That story about Irvine's history is an urban legend. It was actually
>> designed by prominent architect Horace Trumbauer
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace_Trumbauer), who was also
>> responsible for the Keswick Theatre, the Public Ledger Building, and
>> campus buildings for Hahnemann, Jefferson, Duke, Harvard, and the
>> Tyler School of Art.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wilma de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 
>> I went there on Sept. 26th for GI because it¹s moved to the 4th floor
>> in the Perelman Center.
>> 
>> They have built and named new streets in order to enter the Free
>> Parking Garage for Patients. (try to find it!)
>> 
>> It was quiet, not crowded and easy to get through because it¹s not
>> quite finished.
>> 
>> Still, it is ugly, forbidding and most certainly not pedestrian
>> friendly as most of Penn¹s modern buildings.
>> 
>> Gee, everyone thought Irvine Auditorium was poorly designed, but he
>> forced them to construct it because he became rich and donated money
>> despite not making it at Penn¹s School of Architecture.
>> 
>> I also hate that Lego building at 40th & Chestnut Sts.
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/24/08 4:21 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> 
>>     Beloved friends and neighbors:
>>      
>>     Inga Saffron wrote an article in the Inquirer berating the
>>     architectural design of Penn's new Perelman Cancer Center across
>>     from CHOP.
>>      
>>     One of the reader comments -- as follows -- could well have been
>>     written about our own monstrous consequence of Penn's lack of
>>     architectural sensitivity.
>>      
>> 
>>         Inga Saffron is an architecture critic, and what she  has done
>>         is appropriately critiqued the style of this building, not its
>>          internal qualifications as a treatment center. Pandering for
>>         sympathy is not  going to change the fact that
>>         architecturally, this building doesn't do its  job. Yes,
>>         hospitals have to accommodate vehicles, but in a city any
>>         building  has a responsibility to do its part relating to its
>>         surroundings. This  building may do its job as a hospital, but
>>         it completely ignores its  surroundings and the city, and pays
>>         only attention to its insular purpose. As  architecture it has
>>         failed.
>>          
>> 
>>     *Al Krigman
>>     *reminding you that you read it first, here, on the */popu-list/*
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to