I just returned and read Ms Goldman’s letter in the UC Review.  Bravo Ms. 
Goldman!

It appears that SHCA held the typical secret closed board meeting to plot the 
“NON-OPPOSITION” position for their Penn masters. What a surprise, a closed 
board meeting!

 Certainly, the poor hard working volunteer experts of the SHCA leadership feel 
uncomfortable because a few loudmouths in their midst shout down “community 
improvement.”  These SHCA clowns never stop!

Let’s ask Grossbach to view any non-opposition letter now, before it is 
presented to the ZBA.   We should expect a surprise submission by Penn 
FOLLOWING the public testimony phase, just prior to ZBA approval of Campus Inn. 
 


Since the Oct. 23, 2007 hearing of the architectural committee, the bold lies 
from the Campus Inn team ALWAYS follow the public testimony at these 
prearranged charades of public hearings, as will occur at ZBA.  These pay to 
play city agencies have the Penn team present their talking points first.  
Then, members of the public have one chance, in 2-3 minute slots, to testify.

But then, the Penn team is always allowed to speak again and the public is 
barred from correcting misinformation and bold lies.  That is when the secret 
non-opposition letter from the embattled SHCA will be submitted. The thing will 
not be read publicly, but spun by the Penn lawyers as a letter actually 
indicating community support!  


  It is exactly a year since the Oct 23rd architectural committee rejection of 
Campus Inn.  Without reposting the timeline of subsequent SHCA treachery and 
betrayal of this community, remember that I immediately wrote to and copied to 
this public list, a request to SHCA and Grossbach for clarification of the 
testimony regarding the Olshin claims of a series of previous “open, public 
forums” hosted by the SHCA zoning committee.  

For four months until the zoning committee was cornered by an angry betrayed 
community, Grossbach chose to ignore that simple request for clarification of 
what appeared to be a bold and repeated lie.  Again typical, but unfortunately 
for SHCA most of the barking cheese gang is laying low, and my character was 
not attacked continuously for those 4 months as SHCA might have expected.  

SHCA had already been caught providing additional aid to the Penn team’s 
repeated lies by attempting to cloak the Nov. 9th false public testimony about 
an additional public forum scheduled the following week.  That bold perjury 
turned out to be the SHCA “election” meeting and not even SHCA members had been 
informed that a Campus Inn show would occur-- an itsy bitsy mistake by the hard 
working thankless volunteers!

In Feb., a FEW HOURS before the “unanimous” community rejection of the hotel, 
at the only meeting which had become public and forced to an appropriate venue 
only a few days prior; a forwarded post from Grossbach arrived on this list.   
That post claimed that all of the perjury by the Penn team about overwhelming 
community support and a series of open public forums was a simple unimportant 
mistake that should be swept under the rug!  An angry Grossbach repeated this 
ridiculous suggestion that evening, in response to Mr. Moyer’s public exposure 
of the perjury in public recorded testimony.

 But why indignation after a four month delay before this untrue clarification? 
 Hahaha!

The SHCA continuous betrayal of this community, for a complete year, has been 
thoroughly exposed!  Experience and not prophesy tell me that the 
non-opposition letter, which will remain secret, will convey the following. 

 The hotel opposition is crazy and has made the hard working SHCA volunteer 
experts very uncomfortable.  While the community experts really support 
community improvement and the widely popular Campus Inn, the SHCA organization 
has decided to officially take a non-opposition position for either side.  

With no one from the public permitted to speak at this point in the ZBA 
charade, the Penn attorneys will submit the letter and have a free pass to 
portray the community non-opposition letter as actually support for Campus Inn. 
 Those in attendance will hear about the discomfort of hard working SHCA 
volunteers and how a few crazy NIMBYS forced this letter.  The SHCA statement 
already foreshadows the justification for the official non-opposition position, 
even though the community really supports Campus Inn.

ASK GROSSBACH FOR A PREVIEW OF ANY LETTER IMMEDIATELY SO THAT IT CAN BE POSTED 
ON THIS PUBLIC LISTSERV!!!!!  But please don’t hold your breath while he 
ignores you.

Standing tall with Ms. Goldman,
Glenn 

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to