Ray,
It is you who are fantasizing. PennPraxis does not "oppose" developers
at the waterfront, and it does not "not oppose" developers on 40th St.
Its products tend to be airier -- overarching principles, rather like
the ones you are so fond of writing. Blessing or opposing particular
projects is not its business at all.
Name one meeting or plan delivered by PennPraxis at which the Campus Inn
even came up. Cite one overarching principle enunciated by PennPraxis
with regard to 40th St. that, in your opinion, means there should be no
highrise hotel at Pine St.
Casinos did come up at meetings run by PennPraxis and the plan it
churned out did oppose two such very specific developments -- not
"developers" in general. Neighbors in both waterfront neighborhoods --
Pennsport and Fishtown -- have been hospitable to other largescale
projects in their vicinity.
Blessing or opposing particular projects can only be the deed of
governmental bodies. You are squirming like a worm on a hook, trying to
deny the existence of the obvious.
-- Tony West
your fantasy ramblings miss the simple fact that penn praxis opposes
developers at the waterfront while not opposing developers at 40th and
pine, even though neighbors in both cases are opposed to the developers.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
