"The workshops will not be open to the public and are by invitation only"
Thanks Ray,
The link included the original UC Review story which I forgot when I
responded to Craig.
Sokoloff did not include this very very important information about
the workshop sample in his latest piece. Legitimate researchers must
always report these serious limitations to their sampling. (He uses the
word "gathered" to hide the sample)
Citizens were not invited to this "workshop" to recommend how their
voices should be included. It's hilarious!!!
He really thinks the people of Philadelphia are stupid. Here is the Review:
http://ucreview.com/penns-project-for-civic-engagement-hosts-workshops-closed-to-the-public-p1870-1.htm
On 12/14/2010 11:26 AM, UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
krf...@aol.com wrote:
I'm not a fan of the "community engagement" process on
which Harris Sokoloff is building his reputation, but
craigso...@aol.com wrote:
I'm not happy with the way they engaged in selective
engagement. It was deficient at best, fraudulent at
worst.
the 'community engagement' process:
http://www.mail-archive.com/univcity@list.purple.com/msg24571.html
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3315 - Release Date: 12/14/10
02:34:00
