Yeah, but you clipped the contribution Glenn gave...  he was making points, 
asking good questions.  And these are scary days!

On Sep 17, 2011, at 3:19 PM, William H. Magill wrote:

> 
> On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Glenn wrote:
> 
>> It is responsible for police to reserve comment about any details, 
>> identities or investigation.  But the public has a right to know, if there 
>> was an official report made about acts of violence or not.  The basic report 
>> of an alleged crime makes no difference if the Lt. was on the scene, and the 
>> initial 2 day old report is not a classified secret.  Information is either 
>> confidential/unconfirmed or it is not, no matter who is "on the scene."  
> 
> Glenn,
> 
> You would be the first to scream bloody murder that someone's due process 
> rights were being violated if the police released ANY information.
> 
> And you would scream all the louder if all they did was read the incident 
> report, and the Incident Report stated that a specific type individual was 
> the reported perp.
> 
> Police reticence is not only "responsible" but required by law.
> 
> That the police talk about an incident AT ALL is something which skirts very 
> close to making the crime and the perpetrator un-prosecutable.
> And this is only compounded by the "Philly-'tude" …. don't snitch.
> 
> Should this case go to a jury trial, anyone who is a member of this listserve 
> would be "tainted" by the discussions which have taken place here, and likely 
> be judged unfit to serve.
> 
> It matters not how self righteous you feel or sound-off about the "public's 
> right to know," the fact is that the legal system has its own rules which you 
> must obey or suffer the consequences. The consequences in this case being 
> that the Perp is released back on the street free to do whatever again.
> 
> William H. Magill
> Block Captain
> 4400 Chestnut Street
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to