You had to use the term garbage?  This is like an all or nothing contest of 
good and bad and you are the hero keeping people safe from garbage?  I'm 
obnoxious; and you have said I don't learn and force things on people?????????  
 Even though truth for you is a tactic for winning!  You call someone who can't 
respond a "Malignant clown" but at least you are a perfect opposite now that 
you've said it.  What a hero!!  I know you'll tell me you don't give two shits 
what I think... but I wish you could express other than sheer emotional 
certitude about people because I have profound positive feelings for you and 
for Glenn as well.

On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Brian Siano wrote:

> On 3/19/12, Richard Conrad <rdcon...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> I'm sending this to the listserve and to Glenn who now can see that Kyle has
>> stated he CAN join the listserve and according to this email by Kyle he was
>> not pre-banned and can join the listserve if he wants to, which would mean I
>> would not ever have to consider forwarding any of his emails - and thus can
>> avoid Kyle's ire (as Kyle has used his power to censor me before and
>> expressed his request to me off line to NOT forward Glenn's things to the
>> listserve).  Thank you Kyle for your current level of patience and thank you
>> Glenn for your input, now everyone is encouraged by me to shake hands and
>> come out sharing, politely and responsibly!!
> 
> I'd like to mention that the only time Glenn's ever been an issue on
> _this_ list is when Rich Conrad insisted on bringing Glenn's garbage
> over here. This was obnoxious behavior on Rich's part. I'd hoped that
> he'd learned that it's not his duty to force people to read Glenn
> Moyer's comments. Apparently that's not the case.
> 
> I see absolutely no reason to let Glenn on this listserv. Because Kyle
> made a mere joke about pre-banning him, Glenn _threatened legal
> action_ to have the list shut down. As Kyle says, Glenn's attempt at
> censoring this list _worked,_, forcing its migration to Google Groups.
> Glenn maintains that he's the victim here. And Rich seems to think
> that we should be forced to accept this malignant clown on the list.
> 
> He is not entitled to appear on every list out there, especially ones
> where he clearly intends to be an angry, disruptive, insulting,
> mean-spirited source of lies and personal attacks.
> 
> Glenn has never had any problems in posting to the univcity "purple"
> list. Nobody's preventing him from doing that. It still has hundreds
> of subscribers. Let him stay there.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "UCNeighbors" 
> group.
> To post to this group, send email to u...@ucneighbors.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> ucneighbors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ucneighbors?hl=en

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to