Triode wrote: > There's a post higher up the thread on the -b option, but I'm supprised > you need to use it at those parameters as the defaults are close to: -b > 2048:3446. I'd expect you wanting to try making them bigger not > smaller. (I'd leave the output one and adjust the input one)
This is really odd if those are the defaults! I was getting some minor dropouts with 192 and continuous dropouts with 352.8. I added -b 256:256 and restarted SL and all was fine. I'll play around with it some more and let you know. Triode wrote: > (I say close to as the option is multipled by 1024 to get the actual > size and then rounded to a multiple of samples) > > There is nothing in the code to lock memory into ram at present (which > squeezeplay has). I wonder if people are going to experiment with then > whether we need to consider this. Will look into this - perhaps people > can confirm which systems they are testing on for this, so that if I > produce a test binary I can target it to the right one(s). Thanks for the information and consideration. Triode wrote: > Can't comment on DSD I'm afraid. I have some friends that can work on this, but the road block is how to properly add support in LMS... Jesus R ------------------------------------------------------------------------ vortecjr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30173 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97046 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
