marcoc1712 wrote:
> Is now possible to use high or very high quality settings in runtime on
> a 'normal' server?
I am sure you don't need me to explain that it may be a problem playing
in realtime, a track of 04:15, when it takes 09:00 to process. ;) What
is a, "normal server"? LOL.
Seriously, CORE5 is a "two generation old" Corei5 laptop. NUC5P is the
second NUC up from bottom of the current range. PI3B is well, a Pi3B.
WANDQ, a Wandboard quad.
Code:
--------------------
Input file : 01_-_Something_More_Besides_You.flac
Output File : 'DSD64-{safe,fast,hq}.dsf'
Channels : 2
Sample Rate : 2.8224e+06
Precision : 1-bit
Duration : 00:04:16.55 = 724077312 samples ~ 19241 CDDA sectors
Sample Encoding: 1-bit Direct Stream Digital
##
## SAFE
##
/usr/bin/time sox 01_-_Something_More_Besides_You.flac\
-b1 -c2 x-safe.dsf rate -v 2822400 sdm -f safe
CORE5 0:40.67 elapsed
NUC5P 2:08.51 elapsed
PI3B 6:22.03 elapsed
WANDQ 8:26.77 elapsed
##
## FAST
##
/usr/bin/time sox 01_-_Something_More_Besides_You.flac\
-b1 -c2 x-fast.dsf rate -v 2822400 sdm -f fast
CORE5 0:40.42 elapsed
NUC5P 2:08.68 elapsed
PI3B 6:24.24 elapsed
WANDQ 8:25.15 elapsed
##
## HQ
##
/usr/bin/time sox 01_-_Something_More_Besides_You.flac\
-b1 -c2 x-hq.dsf rate -v 2822400 sdm -f hq
CORE5 0:40.35 elapsed
NUC5P 2:08.57 elapsed
PI3B 7:13.51 elapsed
WANDQ 9:12.47 elapsed
--------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97046
_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
