d6jg wrote: > Personally I think using a USB is a retrograde step. The Pi's USB > implementation is probably its weakest point. I predict issues where the > USB drive just disappears for no apparent reason. I'd stick with a > network mount. A NAS is going to be far more resilient unless it is > either very old or very cheap. > > > Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.. and all of a Pi's I/O hangs off that USB > bus .. and even plugging in a gigabit USB port on a USB 2 seems somewhat pointless.
A Pi is not a good server. Convenient, very, but it's no file server. Banana Pi is much better (PCI linked gig-e and SATA, but even that still has no USB 3). -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k albums.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107932 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
