I think there may be some problems in xPostFacto's SCSI protocols in 10.2 
Jaguar. On two different 7500's I had 10.2 be very flaky, crashing, drives 
not mounted, no CD booting, no Classic mode. Finally the lack of CD booting 
on original Apple hardware made me realize that the SCSI bus had some 
problems. Since the 7500's have two SCSI buses, I switched the internal cable 
to the external bus connector, and instantly all the problems disappeared.

I had a tough time getting10.2 to install. The problem was booting to the 
installer (the installation to HD was seamless). I had kernal panics using 
xPostFacto 2.2.2, .3 & .4; only having success with older 2.2.1. The panic 
printouts always had: SCSI IO kit not found; SCSIoldworldpatch not loaded; 
etc. After I switched buses, the system has been solid, Classic mode now 
works fine, and CD's now boot normally again. The strangest thing is that 
after a week not running, with no pram battery installed, and the reset 
pressed twice for 30 seconds a week apart, the system booted automatically 
into 10.2 on a drive with ID 5 instead of 9.1 on ID 0 (the default startup 
disk)? I was flabbergasted. Later, when I tried to boot into 9.1 by using the 
option key, the 9.1 boot started normally, and then it mysteriously restarted 
itself, and rebooted back into 10.2? I've run Disk Doctor, Disk Warrior & 
Techtool 3 on the drives, and I still get the same behavior. If I try 
rebooting on the internal bus, it's back to the same old stuff (it flashes a 
floppy, won't boot from the CD (floppy boot is OK), and won't mount drives). 
I've zapped the PRAM, reinstalled the xPostFacto extensions & boot, basically 
done everything. Still the internal buses on two different 7500's are 
severely flaky at best. I never had these problems up until the 10.2 
installation. My surmise is that xPostFacto has stuck something into NVRAM 
that is really non-volatile and that messes up the internal SCSI in 10.2? If 
this isn't the case, then 7500's may have a specific problem; or mine both 
were simultaneously stricken?

I'm happy to be rock solid now, but I read that the external bus is half the 
speed of the internal, so I'd really like to get back to the internal. 
Charles Dostale recently posted his results of tests on disk data transfers 
using Disk Banger from the developer CHUD group of utilities. I downloaded 
the current CHUD utility to try and measure my drives, and it says Disk 
Banger has been withdrawn from CHUD because it produced highly unreliable 
results with certain combinations of hardware!

I used "L2 cache config." in 10.1.5, but in 10.2 I've used the PowerLogix 
Cache Control X program with a Newertech G/3 and the XLR8 Mach Speed Control 
with an XLR8 card. The new Sonnet X-Tune cache program says it fixes the 
System Profiler problem (in 9, 10 or both?). Has anyone tried the Sonnet 
cache program with non-Sonnet cards? I'd try it myself, but I'm taking a 
breather from system modifications right now. Thanks! Kris Tilford

-- 
Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to