Re: panther vs. jag on 733 G4

[Roger Harris]

When you use it full time for a bit it does not seem clumsy. It starts 
making a lot of since, with only a couple of meaningful exceptions. It 
should run very well on a 733 G4. If the 733 is the model without a L2 
cache that will be a hit on performance. All Macs like L2s but OSX 
really likes it. I think the 733 has a good graphics card and that will 
help a lot. Panther will work very good with 512 and perfect with twice 
that.

have Fun
roger
Mark Koan wrote:

I only use OS X at a work site, and was kind of
avoiding it since it was so counter-inutive and,
really, slow. But they upgraded to Panther and it
feels like a Mac again! Memory is low on these
machines [384-512] but Panther is definately better
than jag for them. 



--
Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
     Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com