If that were the case ALL software would be bloated because all software has at least one feature that one person does not use ...
And with an OS, its the under the hood changes that we all use without knowing that are really the features.
David
On Apr 12, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Ken Norris wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
It's the dropping of pre-firewire machines that WE need to care about.
Why? I don't see that Tiger presents any more useful advantage to a SC user than Panther. In fact, I probably won't be an early adopter, because there is no reason to spend $$ on something I can't take advantage of. I'm just not that much of a 'power user'.
OTOH, I won't get another machine without firewire, though. I'm doing more stuff with music and need wideband I/O for multi-track recording in realtime. You can't reliably capture more than two at a time with USB at high resolutions. It's all too easy for stuff to drop out in any case, so the more the system can handle, the better. But Panther is already 'bloatware' to me. I don't use a lot of it.
All the best, Ken N.
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com
