guys,
if i may,
the argument has gone far enough. i'm sure you are both honest enough individuals. me--i must not be that honest since i don't think i'd have a problem installing an non-family pack os x on multiple machines at home--especially if they were unsupported--although i do think the family pack is a good deal. but as i only have one machine, i don't even have to cross that bridge. that fine print doesn't mean much to me. all i know is that one thing you have to agree on is that if your data gets completely destroyed, its never the manufacturer's fault. here at work it's another matter. we go completely by the book and i'm glad we do. i agree about the "spirit of the agreement". and i also agree that nit-picking is what these things are about too. they are written by lawyers who get paid to master nit-picking.
-f
Hans Sittler wrote:
David M. Ensteness wrote:
Don't claim to be honest when you are knit picking EULAs to try and
find justifications to claim your 10.2 family license somehow applies
to 10.3, 10.4, and later yet to be announced versions.
Sorry, but I don't see any other way to read a EULA than 'nit-picking'.
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com
