-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Frederico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Brandon Stout wrote: > >> Are my premises for using it all accurate? > > Of course they are. If it gets the job done and you have the desired results. > > If socat and a bash script are all you need for your webserver, thats > great too. If its design accomplishes your purpose - that's the way > to go! I'm not sure if I'm getting the desired results. I think I am, but I want to see what others think. I'll restate my premises as questions: * Does RedirectPermenent sends the appropriate signal to whatever is requesting the domain, saying that this is a permanent thing? Is that signal more appropriate than a mod rewrite, which doesn't tell the web anything, but just redirects internally? * Does it require less processing? Is it significantly less enough that it makes a difference when hosting hundreds of domains? * If it requires less processing, it's almost certainly faster to do a RedirectPermanent instead of a mod rewrite, but is it significantly faster, when hosting hundreds of domains on the same server? * Is there less coding involved? Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkndhY0ACgkQx0pgn74qrcJgVgCfTKQJr5/OQCQksw2HdVAAQP5L 9JIAn3lZMXH3akwJnRVa4pvzNyukS5gj =fzTs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
