On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Sean Thayne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Wade Preston Shearer < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 23 Mar 2011, at 15:58, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Wade, it takes a while to recognize benefits of local, staging, and > > > production environments. > > > > > > I'm sure you will get there as you keep developing more apps. > > > > > > I agree that for you today that system is beneficial. > > > > What is the benefit of having your development environment be local > instead > > of remote? I can think of several cons. The only pro I can think of is > that > > you don't have to have an internet connection. > > > > If my development process includes personal development area (sandbox), > > staging, and production, why does it matter if my sandbox is local or > > remote? > > > > > As long as you have samba and a quick internet connection. You have a good > setup in my opinion. > > Working with ftp/sftp has always been a pain. There is a lag. Even on quick > connections. Plus most editors and even some of the IDE's don't have good > (or any) support for remote editing. Where as all of them can use Samba and > remotely edit the files. Quick and very easy! > > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ > This is probably obvious and I am sure I know the answer to this, however, do people typically setup a dev box and prod box as the same hardware? Using a dev box, especially in a team environment, how do you prevent a run-away cpu cycle or memory usage due to bad code? I have done many stupid things while coding that has brought my machine to it's knees. I shudder to think of doing that on a Prod or Dev box that multiple people use. Sean, sorry for the duplicate mail, I hit reply instead of sending it to the group. _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
