Do the tomcats for all 3 have similar configurations? Am especially interested
in any sort of compression/gzip configs. Have you used the yslow plugin to
compare the versions of uPortal? If so... are there any new suggestions with
the later versions or decreases in ratings for specific areas?
With regards to uPortal, have there been any new tweaks/changes/additions to
the JPA code since 3.0?
Are the test users you are using new to uPortal (does a new layout have to be
generated and persisted) or are you reusing the same users for each test?
What you describe sounds very similar to what we ran into with the original
2.6.1 vs 3.0 perf testing. Those tests turned up a number of issues ranging
from some functional, but performance killing JPA issues (easily fixed), to a
pluto bug that Eric fixed. Think we saw 5 or 6 issues in all. Same sort of
behavior... all versions were pretty comparable until a tipping point was
reached and 3.0 couldn't handle the load. After the issues were fixed, 3.0 was
actually faster in some respects and was definitely comparable to 2.6.1.
uPortal 3.1 and 3.2 have had a lot of development done and are fully
functional, but I doubt anyone has seriously pushed them as hard as you are
now. The causes are likely going to vary a good deal, but I would focus on
what is new in 3.1/3.2 since the latest point releases of 3.0 proved to be
sufficiently performant with a very similar set of tests. Taking that approach
should reduce the amount of code to look at... since the changes between 2.6.1
and 3.1 or 3.2 are far greater than those of 3.0 to 3.1 or 3.2.
-Lennard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Bragg" <abr...@unicon.net>
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2010 10:13:54 PM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona)
Subject: [uportal-dev] Fwd: uPortal Peformance
Hello,
I'm doing some performance testing, and I could use some hints on a couple of
issues. First, I'm looking for some hints on things I can tweak in 3.1.1/3.2.1
to improve performance under heavy load. Second, I'm hitting a bug in 2.6.1
that is preventing me from gathering solid baseline performance numbers, and
perhaps someone else has seen it. Let me explain in further detail.
We have been preparing for an upgrade of our production systems from uPortal
2.6.1 to uPortal 3.x. Currently, we're looking at two 3.x versions, 3.1.1 and
3.2.1. In my development environment, I have installed 2.6.1, 3.1.1, and
3.2.1. My 2.6.1 install is running out of a 5.5.28 Tomcat, and my 3.x versions
are running in a 6.0.24 Tomcat. All versions are running under Java version
1.6.0_12-b04, 64-bit, and I have an Oracle 11gR2 database backing them.
The layout in each instance is a simple 5-tab layout, with nothing on the
default tab. I have a custom testing portlet that simply executes a SQL query
5, 10, or 15 times and renders a 3-line text output. On the remaining four
tabs, I have mixtures of two or more of these testing portlets. I run tests
with JMeter, and the click path is get login page, login, click tab 2, click
tab 3, click tab 4, click tab 5, and logout. JMeter verifies each page renders
properly. The tests I run execute this click path 4000 times spread across 1,
4, 50, and 200 threads, and there are no waits built into the scripts.
Here are results from the tests I have run so far. The values are the 90th
percentile page-response time in seconds. Please note that the number for
2.6.1 in the 200-thread column isn't valid. At the 200-thread level most of
the 200 threads complete their 20 iterations before JMeter starts additional
threads during ramp-up. I end up with no more than 4 or 5 threads running
concurrently. Another thing that skews these numbers is that I can only get
valid results using users that have successfully logged in before. Anything
above 2 threads with users that have not previously logged in results in
channels failing to render (with the message "You are not authorized to view
this channel").
version 1 4 50 200 50-lb2 200-lb2 50-lb4 200-lb4
2.6.1 0.07 0.08 0.7 *0.08* 0.69 4.56
3.1.1 0.09 0.09 1.96 7.81 1.18 6.02 1.12 5.49
3.2.1 0.17 0.18 7.04 26.43 6.17 20.22
The "lb2" and "lb4" designators signify that I have started multiple Tomcats on
the server, 2 for lb2 and 4 for lb4, and I'm balancing load with HAProxy. I
see much better utilization on the server, and both page-response times and
elapsed test run times (below) both improve significantly even though I have
not added any additional hardware.
This table shows the elapsed time in seconds to complete the above tests.
version 1 4 50 200 50-lb2 200-lb2 50-lb4 200-lb4
2.6.1 934 454 216 212 209.09 263.43
3.1.1 1,537 462 495 813 386.92 660.39 421.41 414.32
3.2.1 3,299 862 1,999 3,958 1259.99 2636.8
Basically, what I see here is that at low concurrency 2.6.1 and 3.1.1 are
fairly comparable, and 3.2.1 is noticeably slower. At 50 threads and above, I
see that 2.6.1 is much faster than 3.x. I also see that at very high loads,
3.x seems to have a point where it just falls over the edge of a cliff.
Part of that I'm sure is the change in page sizes. Here are the page sizes
JMeter reports (this does not include embedded resources).
2.6.1 3.1.1 3.2.1
Avg. Bytes Avg. Bytes Avg. Bytes
Login Page 2014.93 12865 23963
Login 2958.61 21716 21909
Tab 1 5950.05 24221.21 24656
Tab 2 8840.34 26755.38 27430
Tab 3 8835.95 26753.3 27428
Tab 4 7380.03 25525.27 26068
Logout 2014.94 12865 23963
TOTAL 5427.84 21528.74 25059.57
So, back to my two questions.
1. What has changed in 3.1.1 that might explain a significant (at least 2x
slowdown under load)? To me it feels like 2.6.1 is caching rendered elements
to a much greater degree than 3.1.1. What can I tweak to improve this?
2. Is anyone aware of something I can change to fix the behavior with new
logins in 2.6.1 to prevent this issue with channels not authorized?
Thanks,
Alex Bragg
Unicon, Inc.
--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
lful...@unicon.net
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
