Great news, thanks Eric. 

regards,
Steve


On 06/05/2011, at 10:02 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:

> 3.3 == 4.0
> 
> Just like you said, we decided that with so much work being done in 3.3, 
> primarily around removing IChannel support, it would be better to jump a 
> major version to 4.0
> 
> We are still planning complete support for data migration with the goal of 
> being able to export from 2.5, 2.6, 3.0, 3.1, or 3.2 and import that data 
> into 4.0
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On 5/5/11 6:18 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> 
>> How does uPortal 4 compare with uPortal 3.3? Is it because there was a lot 
>> of work in 3.3 that it was decided to be a major release, aka uPortal 4?
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>> On 06/05/2011, at 4:28 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
>> 
>>> Well due to the time-sucking wonders that was a state-wide HR system 
>>> upgrade I lost a big chunk of time for uPortal 4 work. Just to keep 
>>> everyone here in the loop the current plan is to do a uPortal 4.0.0-M2 on 
>>> 5/9 and then get the RC1 cut right before the conference. So if you have 
>>> new-feature work that you have planned for uPortal 4 please plan on trying 
>>> to have it complete by 5/18.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> -Eric
>>> 
>> 
> 


-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: 
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to