On 23 November 2012 14:54, Sebastien Bacher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 23/11/2012 15:50, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit : > >> That means we will have to distinguish the case where we have both >> autostart desktop file & upstart job file in the upstart-managed session. >> (e.g. gwibber shipping both). >> This migration is very similar to how we currently support both upstart >> jobs and sysvinit scripts, by letting upstart manage both: natively or >> via-bridge. > > > Hey, > > I don't think tha tthe "via-bridge" is needed. Those autostart have > OnlyShowIn=GNOME;Unity;XFCE;LXDE;... if unity is upstart managed and we > provide a job for that service we should just drop Unity of the .desktop > sessions list...
Ok good. I believe currently we wanted to introduce a new session name, such that this can be tested in parallel - e.g. login into unity or unityupstart (names are not defined yet) That this bit is actually easy then and indeed a bridge is not needed. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
