Hi, > i wonder if we should start a src/cpu/ or src/arch/ tree and put bfin under > there ?
It is a good idea, and there are other possible candidates for src/cpu hidden in the bus driver code already (mips ejtag and arm9 ice). However, it seems there's a deadline for integration of the Blackfin code in UrJTAG? In this case, I'd prefer to have the code integrated as-is right now, and sort out the generalization afterwards. >> * add a new field 'main_part' to struct URJ_CHAIN >> * add a new filed 'params' to struct URJ_PART and its related > could you describe these new pieces a bit more in detail ? like why we had to I also would like to learn a bit more about these. "chain->main_part" at first sight seems to equal "chain->parts->len - 1" (as is chain->active_part just after detect) so I'm not sure why an extra parameter is needed. Kolja -- mr. kolja waschk - haubach-39 - 22765 hh - germany fon +49 40 889130-34 - fax -35 - http://www.ixo.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
