On 02/02/2010 08:08 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello all! > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Arnim Läuger<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> When doing development on UrJTAG, I found sometimes dumping tap state >>> was useful for debugging. I attached a log below. What do you think? Is >>> it OK? >> >> I'd vote for this one. > > I think this is very helpful feature and I even thought of it > recently. I think also it should be optional, and it could be divided > into "debug levels" - ie. at debug level 0 no dump is performed, at > debug level 1 only informational messages are printed out to show what > is happening, and at debug level 2 more or all information is > displayed... what do You think? :-) > I like this idea very much. But I think this can be another patch by itself. We need to categorize all debug logs and done it in one separate patch.
Jie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
