On Friday 05 February 2010 20:49:50 Jie Zhang wrote: > On 02/06/2010 09:20 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 05 February 2010 01:23:28 Jie Zhang wrote: > >> gdbproxy does not work with the latest UrJTAG. > > > > how about this patch ? seems to work for me ... > > I think the concept of "endianness" does not apply in JTAG. It is not > defined in the standard. > > I prefer to "SHIFT_ORDER_STANDARD" and "SHIFT_ORDER_REVERSED". Or > "SHIFT_LSB_FIRST" and "SHIFT_MSB_FIRST".
i dont see any practical difference between "big endian" and "MSB" and "little endian" and "LSB", but i dont care too much here. i can call the fields "bit_order" instead of "endian" use the defines URJ_BIT_ORDER_LSB / URJ_BIT_ORDER_MSB. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
