On 02/09/2010 05:36 AM, Arnim Läuger wrote: > >> Now I propose a patch for UrJTAG to use this new libftdi to improve the >> performance. When using the new libftdi, gdbproxy reads memory at about >> 110.2KB/s. Compared with previous 10.3KB/s, I would say it's a big >> improvement. > > This sounds really amazing! > >> Since this patch does not change the default settings of UrJTAG, it's >> not intrusive. I'm going to commit it in 24 ~ 48 hours if no one objects. > > Highly appreciated from my side. > > Is it possible to have both the new and old versions of libftdi and > libusb installed in parallel? I see a compat wrapper for libusb-1.0 so I > assume that you can have libusb-1.0 and the backwards compatible > libusb-0.1 wrapper in parallel. The new libftdi has to be installed > exclusively? This would be fine however, since UrJTAG is the only > application which uses libftdi on my system. > libusb-1.0 and libusb-0.1 can be installed in parallel. But the two libftdi libraries can't. But you can install the new libftdi into a new directory and statically linked it into UrJTAG.
Jie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
