On 07/12/2010 12:53 p.m., Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Gaston Rodriguez
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> (..)   it seems that you are right! Slowing down the frequency makes it work
>> almost equal than with my patch. The cpu usage is high the first 26-27
>> seconds, but then is low.
> Good to hear! :-) If only you heard how many chain initialization and
> debug problems are related to clock frequency (on the OpenOCD mailing
> list there was large discussion on that recently)...
>
> Please try to modify the svf file and use the newer code with data
> compacting - if it works fine please revert changes as this problem
> was rather svf file specific and the compacting code notably speeds up
> the transfers :-)
My test was made with the current UrJtag, rev 1868 with no changes.

Gastón.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to