On Monday, December 06, 2010 13:04:40 Gaston Rodriguez wrote: > On 03/12/2010 11:20 p.m., Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday, December 03, 2010 17:46:29 Gaston Rodriguez wrote: > >> I'm using UrJtag to program/erase Actel Fpgas. With previous urjtag (rev > >> 1737) works fine. The ERASE file is executed in about 53 seconds. But > >> with latest UrJtag (rev 1868) the player reach the line 110 of the SVF > >> file and never finishes. > > > > please narrow it down. use git and you can use the automated bisect. > > Ok, I think I found where the problem starts... (thanks to "git bisect", > what a nice tool!) > The last report is: > > 5c3e634a0e4daaf1cf3f6f37ca8a90833a33b046 is the first bad commit
so reset to the current git head and do `git revert 5c3e634a0e4daaf1c` and see if things still work -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
