Hello,

We have a patch that adds an 'interface' parameter to the cable command 
(for FT2232 based devices). The JTAG A (0/1) or B (2) can be chosen, 
JTAG A is the default. It works with FTD2xx and libFTDI:
http://dangerousprototypes.com/forum/index.php?topic=1490.msg15772#msg15772

We have some demos on a wiki here:
http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Bus_Blaster_v2_manufacturing_resources#Programming_the_CPLD_with_urJTAG

The Linux compile works great, but we're having some issues with the 
Windows compile (MinGW cross compiled on Debian). Paths seem to require 
a double-backslash (\\) or single forward slash (/). We assume this is 
compiler related instead of a patch related issue. Still some work to 
do, but the current compile will make manufacturing much easier.

What is the procedure for submitting a patch?

Would any urJTAG developers like a Bus Blaster v2 when they are finished 
(about 3 weeks)?

Thank you,

Ian


On 12/17/2010 3:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, December 17, 2010 06:34:04 ian wrote:
>> I made an FT2232H-based JTAG debugger with a CPLD for level shifting and
>> buffer logic. The CPLD is connected to the FT2232 MPSSE2, and I had
>> hoped to program it with urjtag.
>>
>> Is there a way to force the use of MPSSE2? I can't tell if I'm
>> connecting to MPSSE1 or 2. I 'uninstalled' #1 from the Windows device
>> manager, but I still get 'tdo stuck at 1' on the chain scan (expecting
>> the CPLD).
> does libftdi even support MPSSE2 ?  if not, there isnt anything we can do
> about it in urjtag.
> -mike

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to