On Friday, June 17, 2011 11:17:45 Jie Zhang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday, June 13, 2011 17:22:27 Jie Zhang wrote: > >> * Automake changes some variables used in the rules in the patch. We > >> can just take a look at the generated rules in Makefile.in to see what > >> a new rule looks like and modify accordingly. > > > > this is more than many people can handle > > This kind of argument makes no sense at all. I, or someone, or someone > in future, really cannot handle some code in UrJTAG, should we remove > those code?
my experience across many many many packages in the open source world is that people who cannot fathom autotools simply tweak things until it starts working. ive seen a bit of this in urjtag as well. that means if you arent here, the code you propose will simply get slapped around until people stop complaining/filing bugs. i believe that the code i propose has a much lower chance of that occurring. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
