On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 16:13:46 Jonathan Stroud wrote: > On Jul 4, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > flashverify command stuff for example should be a patch by itself (and > > further discussed since i'm pretty sure it breaks existing behavior). > > As you said, this should have been done separately, however I will give a > quick overview of what I did
you are correct. i misread your patch here and what it was doing. > > then have one > > patch which simply adds the new stub enable/disable/write_start/cls > > fields. then one which adds the spi bus driver, and finally one which > > adds the spi flash driver. > > I assume I can just submit each of these patches to this same thread? sure also, please wrap your long lines in your e-mail to standard lengths -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
