On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'll have to review the spi flash driver independently. there's quite > a bit to digest, and i think the current code is hardcoding > assumptions for a specific flash.
Yes, it hardcodes the device table to a fairly generic value. At some point I would like to add support for reading device map that exists in some SPI flash devices. I guess we could add optional command line parameters to the detectflash command to specify address size and data size, burst size, etc., or auto-detect. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
