>Either way, I'd imagine a subscribe client looking to avoid polling is going to depend on a long-lived socket, no? That's part of the point of a websocket. you don't have to keep reopening it, and both ends can use it, as needed.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:38 AM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > No, and Yes. ;-) > > Bob S > > > On Jun 8, 2024, at 6:11 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > * if we get websockets working, that will be another way to make this work. > > Do we need websockets on this? XMPP, for example, runs over regular > sockets. > > Either way, I'd imagine a subscribe client looking to avoid polling is > going to depend on a long-lived socket, no? > > > Richard Gaskin > FourthWorld.com<http://fourthworld.com/> > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And God said, "This is good." _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
