On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote: > The other consideration is that the loop is likely going so fast that even > with the "wait 0" line the screen update may be too slow to keep up and the > only thing you'll get will be the final number.
Belay that. I just tested it, and "wait 0" works as intended, with or without "with messages" -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
