because if it's part of the language, and my vocabulary improves, then I have less crap to move into my libraries, and I would feel a lot less foolish if I discover such a thing later. Even worse, when I throw a kluge into a project, and I can't find it, later, when I need it again, I end up reinventing the wheel each time, and maybe I remember to use the same vernacular, and maybe I don't, in which case I end up biffing myself, sometimes, by using different names in those different projects - synonyms can suck when the parser isn't insightful.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dave Kilroy <d...@applicationinsight.com>wrote: > Mike Kerner wrote > > I was trying to avoid the solution Craig suggested > > Why do you want to avoid it? Making a function to do the job seems the best > way to me! > > > > ----- > "Some are born coders, some achieve coding, and some have coding thrust > upon them." - William Shakespeare & Hugh Senior > > -- > View this message in context: > http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/repeating-string-tp4675472p4675487.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And God said, "This is good." _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode