Andrew Kluthe wrote:
What is a "little longer" in your opinion? 1 year? 5 years? I would hate for runrev to spend several months to make something backwards compatible for a short time. Along with this time spent, I would imagine it would further complicate the code base in non-trivial ways.
Even if try to set aside the developer salaries and technical debt, it's not like it's going to get any less dangerous using an unsupported OS version than it was half a decade ago when it stopped getting security updates.
Every year an unsupported OS is used, the only people writing system-level software for it are organized crime rings.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
