Thanks for the reply, Kevin. I'm glad that no CGI engine is used. 

I did read that the engine will be "compiled to JavaScript". The website also 
says that no plug-in is needed and that the app will run in the browser. Both 
statements say nothing about the server.

The website shows "no install" in big letters and states that the end-user 
doesn't need to install any software. Nowhere it is said that the developer 
doesn't need to install any software on the server. It might help if the 
website explicitly said that no CGI will have to be installed and that only the 
HTML5 files, (text files and perhaps media files), need to be copied onto a 
server. Pehaps it is all clear to native speakers of English, but a more 
explicit wording of the website just might convince some non-native speakers 
who are now reluctant to support the HTML5 initiative.

I still wonder about the closed nature of the HTML5 files. It is probably 
possible to write a converter, which converts the JS to something readable. 
Even without such a converter, one would be able to download the files and put 
them on another web server, perhaps with a few small modifications. Therefore I 
too wonder what a commercial HTML5 license can do for a company. I'm curious 
what Heather will answer Brahmanathaswami on this matter. 

Obviously, obfuscating and licensing are two different things. In my previous 
e-mail, I only meant to say that obfuscation and licensing could offer 
opportunities that make closed-source licensing worthwhile for both RunRev and 
LiveCode users.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other colour 
spaces. http://www.color-converter.com

We have time for new software development projects. Contact me for a quote.






On 17 jul 2014, at 22:35, Kevin Miller wrote:

> This has been set out on the web page for HTML5 and on the video.
> 
> It is not a CGI. It renders client side in the browser, without a plug in.
> 
> Technically yes, you can look at the JavaScript in a browser. However
> given the complexity of it + obfuscation you won¹t realistically be able
> to make much sense of it. There is a whole world of difference between
> obfuscated/unreadable JavaScript protected by copyright and the GPL, which
> requires you to upload the stacks for your entire application with
> readable, editable and redistributable code.
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Kevin
> 
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Everyone can code
> 
> 
> 
> 




_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to