I'll give you 2 cents for that, Éric. I also don't think that RunRev
will listen. Yet, I think a company should not rely on its user base for
testing. A company can't blame its user base for not testing, if
something appears not to work, but a user base can blame the company for
delivering broken software. Therefore, it would be wise to listen.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Installer Maker for LiveCode:
http://qery.us/468
Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner"
http://qery.us/3fi
LiveCode on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/runrev/
On 11/13/2014 10:00, Éric Miclo wrote:
Hello,
I do agree that more testing (non automatic testing) should be made before
releasing a commercial product.
But I’m not sure RunRev will listen.
When the CEO says:
"I really would urge everyone in our community to move to 7 as soon as possible.
We spent 18 months building it and considering the amount of change its getting very good
results stability wise. There are issues but they are mostly minor."
When minor bugs are so many, I don’t consider it is minor to test and fix
before releasing a commercial product.
And by fixing I mean test if the fix really fixes the bug so it doesn’t have to
be reopened immediately.
It is not the amount of time spent on a product that is an indicator of quality.
My 2 cents.
Best,
ÉrIC
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
