> On 29 Aug 2015, at 10:22 pm, Peter TB Brett <peter.br...@livecode.com> wrote: > > This looks like the sort of thing that's best off being looked at by Mark > Waddingham. Unfortunately my last day before my annual holiday is the day > before he gets back from his annual holiday, so I'm not going to be able to > bring this up with him for at least a couple of weeks. Can I suggest that > you e-mail him directly?
I’ll just wait for Mark to get back. It’s a simple one but there’s obviously dire consequences for your stack objects if you set the scriptOnly to true so I’d like to get the nod before bothering. The engine forum has gone fairly quiet lately but the original idea was we would propose stuff we wanted to do then get the nod on syntax and whether it would be accepted if we did it etc. It may be that script only stacks are short term and the long term plan is not to have these scripts be stacks but update start using, back|front script and behavior to point to files rater than objects. Is that why they aren’t documented? > > Or just submit a PR on GitHub, that'll make sure it doesn't get forgotten > about. ;-) I actually had some PRs that were forgotten about although I think both of them have now or will in the future at least become irrelevant because of widgets. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
