Thanks you all for your thoughtful replies.

@Paul Yes this is the direction my thinking has been heading. I think when I 
first toyed with this I didn't really find the application browser accessible 
(in a meaningful way to me) and thought multiple groups just too messy. But 
with the Project Browser and use of other plugins (lcStackBrowser and 
flcControlManager, both excellent alternatives) the overwhelming aspect of 
multiple groupings on a single card are no longer there.

@Peter Thanks for the example of the picker to use should I go this way.

@Bill Thankfully I do not have shifting fields between my tabs. Where a field 
is shared (well duplicated at this time) it is located basically in the same 
place. The coding side might take me a bit to get my head around in bringing 
all the individual cards scripts into one. open card handlers will need to be 
rewritten as well as ensuring no clashes in variables that were local within 
the confines of one script now having to share that same domain. I guess the 
upside is that there will be room to economize.

@Mike That is how I originally thought. It just seemed simpler to have multiple 
cards. It is only now after reading the initial thread and realising the 
maintenance of all these seperate cards scripts might not be the optimal 
approach.

@Scott Thankfully my app does not have hundreds of controls. And although they 
do probably number in the dozens the ability to show/hide them by a click in 
the appropriate browser makes that management well, manageable.

I am more convinced this is worth pursuing/exploring.


James




_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to