What if the result after end block was a block Id? A bit like send in time.
Sent from my iPhone > On 12 Jan 2016, at 5:27 AM, Trevor DeVore <li...@mangomultimedia.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Monte Goulding <mo...@appisle.net> wrote: >> >> >> One thing that might work to avoid having multiple callbacks would be >> completion handler style blocks. This would be particularly helpful if >> their variable scope included the locals in the parent handler. This would >> also give us the choice of declaring a callback either inside or outside >> the current handler. >> >> Using Mark’s example: >> >> on processThing >> load url "..." with block pResultCode, pData, pError >> --- >> end block >> end processThing >> >> — OR >> >> on processThing >> load url "..." with processThing2 >> end processThing >> >> block processThing2 pResultCode, pData, pError >> -- >> end processThing2 > > > Monte, > > I don't see how you would cancel a running operating with the block > example. With your queue idea then you can delete the queue to effectively > cancel it. > > -- > Trevor DeVore > ScreenSteps > www.screensteps.com - www.clarify-it.com > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode