> On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Indeed. I'm not too upset about the loss of the bitshift operators other than > the lack of backward compatibility, but I'm surprised by their demise. In > terms of minimal use of microprocessor cycles I'd expect that the fastest > would be > > a || (b << 8) || (c << 16) || (d << 32)
Yabut - I don’t know if LCScript understands integer numerics. Aren’t numbers always handled as floating point? .Jerry _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
