Thanks, Paul. I didn't realize that there was a performance hit using Rev. How about searching in Rev? HC's searching was amazingly fast, even in the days of SE30s, although I do recall implementing an indexing protocol to make sure account cards were found as fast as I wanted them to be found.

Joe Wilkins

On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Joe,
We have had Rev stacks with well over 10,000 cards.
They open, close, and save much more slowly than the same data in a HyperCard
stack with the same cards. They also require much more memory than the
equivalent HC stacks.
The speed and memory usage problems seem to be exponential (the more cards, the greater the problem). Based on my experience, you should be able to manage stacks with less than 2500 cards in Rev - but don't expect HC performance.
Paul Looney



**************************************
See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to