Camm wrote:
Somehow I doubt Runrev will show any interest looking at the many bugs/enhancements that have been outstanding for many years.
How come you think so? I think RR is doing a very good job with the work on 2.9. So far almost everything I considder a blocker has been fixed (including my pet bugs), so I am pretty happy with how it evolves. Given the time the current beta program has been running I can ´t help but thinking that they take the Beta very seriously this time. If each release would have been tested that well, we would all be happy campers I guess. I am sooooo looking forward to a final of 2.9, and even though I am waiting impatiently I do think it is very well worth the wait for a really stable version. New features after that. I too would like to see quite some features introduced. tree views, real table fields, multichannel audioclips, openGl. All those features do have a different priority for the current userbase, so RR needs to prioriterize their decisions. I on the other hand can decide if it is important enough for me to hire an external writer meanwhile, and I really wish there was a list of people to ask in need of an external coder. *sigh*
All the best, Malte_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
