-= JB =- wrote:
Many things can be done very fast because it is already being done.
Integrating it all can
not be that hard unless they are trying to rewrite it in a different
language and make it do
what is already being done with transcript.
Yup, that's the deal. The current "table" field in Rev's property
inspector is just a regular field with some scripts in it. The
functionality is faked. It's a sophisticated effort but is saddled, by
its nature, with limitations.
What others are talking about is an honest to goodness table object
implemented in the engine. Writing a new object for three operating
systems using a low-level language is, as you mentioned, a huge
undertaking. But if RR wants to have a real table, then that's what
they'd need to do.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
